In a dramatic late-night Senate session that lasted nearly 48 hours, three Republican senators defied party leadership by voting against President Trump’s signature “One Big Beautiful Bill.” The historic vote on July 1, 2025, saw Senators Rand Paul of Kentucky, Thom Tillis of North Carolina, and Susan Collins of Maine break from their party to vote against the bill, forcing Vice President JD Vance to cast the tie-breaking vote in a razor-thin 51-50 decision.
The question of which Republicans voted against Big Beautiful Bill has dominated political headlines as the massive $3.8 trillion legislation now heads back to the House of Representatives for final approval before reaching Trump’s desk.
The Three Republican Defectors Who Voted Against Big Beautiful Bill
Each of the three long-serving GOP members explained their reasons for bucking the president, creating significant drama in what was expected to be a unified Republican vote.
Senator Rand Paul (Kentucky) opposed the legislation primarily due to fiscal concerns. Paul opposed the bill because it would add trillions of dollars to the deficit, staying true to his libertarian principles of fiscal responsibility. His opposition wasn’t surprising to political observers familiar with his consistent stance against increasing government spending.
Senator Thom Tillis (North Carolina) and Senator Susan Collins (Maine) both cited concerns about healthcare provisions. Tillis and Collins feared the cuts to Medicaid were too steep. Collins was particularly vocal about her concerns, stating after casting her no vote: “My difficulties with the bill go far beyond what they could resolve.”
Read also-Did the Big Beautiful Bill Pass
Key Point Summary: Republican Opposition Details
- Total Republican Opposition: 3 senators out of 53 GOP members
- Vote Breakdown: 51-50 with VP Vance casting tie-breaking vote
- Primary Concerns: Deficit spending (Paul), Medicaid cuts (Tillis, Collins)
- Bill Status: Passed Senate, now awaits House approval
- Deadline Pressure: July 4 target for presidential signature
Marathon Senate Session Highlights Deep Party Divisions
The razor’s edge vote reflects the deep intra-party divides created by the bill, which combines tax cuts, border security measures, and defense spending into one comprehensive package. The measure passed after nearly 48 consecutive hours of reading, debating and voting on the amendments, making it one of the longest legislative sessions in recent Senate history.
The debate process was particularly contentious, with Democrats forcing the Senate clerk to read the entire 940-page bill aloud, a procedural tactic that added approximately 12 hours to the proceedings. This strategic delay gave opponents more time to lobby against the legislation and highlight potential problems.
External Pressure and Controversy Surrounding the Vote
The vote took place amid intense external pressure from tech billionaire Elon Musk, who used his social media platform X to criticize the legislation. Musk issued a stark warning, writing “Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame!”
Musk escalated his opposition further, threatening political consequences for supporters and even suggesting the formation of a new political party if the legislation passed. This outside pressure added another layer of complexity to an already challenging vote for Republican leadership.
Impact on Trump’s Legislative Agenda and GOP Unity
The narrow passage represents both a victory and a warning for the Trump administration. While the president secured passage of his signature domestic policy initiative, the close vote reveals fractures within the Republican caucus that could complicate future legislative efforts.
Republicans remain reluctant to give their votes, even on priorities directly endorsed by Trump. This hesitation suggests that the traditional party unity that characterized previous Republican administrations may be more fragile than anticipated.
What’s Next: House Vote and July 4 Deadline
Congress is racing to meet a self-imposed July 4 deadline to send the tax and spending bill to the president. The legislation now returns to the House of Representatives, where Republican leaders must navigate their own potential opposition.
The House passed an initial version of the bill in late May, but the Senate has since made changes, requiring another House vote on the modified legislation. Speaker Mike Johnson faces the challenge of maintaining party unity while addressing concerns raised during the Senate debate.
The timeline is particularly tight, with lawmakers eager to complete legislative business before the Independence Day recess. Any significant delays could push the vote into the following week, potentially complicating the administration’s messaging around the holiday.
Analysis: Long-term Implications for Republican Party
The vote on which Republicans voted against Big Beautiful Bill may signal broader tensions within the GOP between traditional conservative fiscal hawks and Trump’s populist agenda. The three defecting senators represent different constituencies and concerns within the party, suggesting that future votes on major legislation could face similar challenges.
Paul’s deficit concerns reflect the ongoing tension between Trump’s spending priorities and traditional Republican fiscal conservatism. Meanwhile, the healthcare concerns raised by Tillis and Collins highlight the political sensitivity of social program cuts, even within the Republican base.
Political analysts suggest that this vote could serve as a template for future opposition, with fiscally conservative Republicans potentially joining forces with moderate members when specific provisions conflict with their core principles or constituent interests.
The narrow passage of Trump’s signature legislation demonstrates both the president’s continued influence within the Republican Party and the limits of that influence when faced with deeply held policy convictions among individual senators.
Ready to stay informed about the latest political developments? Subscribe to our newsletter for breaking news updates and in-depth analysis of congressional votes and policy changes that affect your daily life.